↓ Skip to main content

Early onset of abdominal venous thrombosis in a newborn with homozygous type II heparin-binding site antithrombin deficiency

Overview of attention for article published in Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early onset of abdominal venous thrombosis in a newborn with homozygous type II heparin-binding site antithrombin deficiency
Published in
Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, April 2017
DOI 10.1097/mbc.0000000000000570
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mirjana Kovac, Gorana Mitic, Milos Jesic, Valentina Djordjevic, Laszlo Muszbek, Zsuzsanna Bereczky

Abstract

The overall incidence of thromboembolic events in the neonatal period is 5 per 100 000 births, wherein more than 40% of all such manifestations are symptomatic renal vein thromboses. We describe the case of a newborn female who developed extensive thrombosis, which filled the inferior vena cava and renal vein and was diagnosed in the first weeks of life. A homozygous type II heparin-binding site antithrombin deficiency (c. 391C>T, p. Leu131Phe) was detected in the background. Despite the timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment, clinical signs of renal insufficiency, because of left kidney atrophy and arterial hypertension, were observed. Our case demonstrates the seriousness of the consequences arising after early onset of venous thrombosis caused by homozygous type II heparin-binding site antithrombin deficiency. In addition to prompt diagnosis, of huge importance is the determination of inherited thrombophilia, as it significantly affects therapeutic treatment and indicates that long-term follow-up is mandatory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unknown 11 69%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2016.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis
#965
of 1,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,371
of 323,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,720 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.