| Title |
Human rights protections are needed alongside PPE for health-care workers responding to COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Global Health, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2214-109x(20)30252-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 20% |
| India | 3 | 5% |
| Argentina | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Pakistan | 2 | 3% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 29 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 69% |
| Scientists | 11 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 23% |
| Unknown | 25 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 32 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2020.
All research outputs
#909,612
of 33,022,911 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Global Health
#697
of 3,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,140
of 447,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Global Health
#25
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,022,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 58.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.