| Title |
All That Glitters Isn’t Gold Critical Care in the Time of Coronavirus Disease 2019
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CHEST, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.071 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 45 | 58% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 48% |
| Scientists | 20 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 24% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,129,520
of 34,547,233 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#775
of 18,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,449
of 458,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#31
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,547,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.