| Title |
How can airborne transmission of COVID-19 indoors be minimised?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environment International, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105832 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lidia Morawska, Julian W Tang, William Bahnfleth, Philomena M Bluyssen, Atze Boerstra, Giorgio Buonanno, Junji Cao, Stephanie Dancer, Andres Floto, Francesco Franchimon, Charles Haworth, Jaap Hogeling, Christina Isaxon, Jose L Jimenez, Jarek Kurnitski, Yuguo Li, Marcel Loomans, Guy Marks, Linsey C Marr, Livio Mazzarella, Arsen Krikor Melikov, Shelly Miller, Donald K Milton, William Nazaroff, Peter V Nielsen, Catherine Noakes, Jordan Peccia, Xavier Querol, Chandra Sekhar, Olli Seppänen, Shin-Ichi Tanabe, Raymond Tellier, Kwok Wai Tham, Pawel Wargocki, Aneta Wierzbicka, Maosheng Yao |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,210 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 136 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 79 | 7% |
| Brazil | 43 | 4% |
| Spain | 42 | 3% |
| Canada | 41 | 3% |
| India | 35 | 3% |
| Japan | 26 | 2% |
| Australia | 20 | 2% |
| Mexico | 20 | 2% |
| Other | 226 | 19% |
| Unknown | 542 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 997 | 82% |
| Scientists | 120 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 71 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 19 | 2% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,937 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1937 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 220 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 206 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 191 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 185 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 80 | 4% |
| Other | 330 | 17% |
| Unknown | 725 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 330 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 174 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 90 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 58 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 55 | 3% |
| Other | 416 | 21% |
| Unknown | 814 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2449. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2026.
All research outputs
#3,690
of 34,452,566 outputs
Outputs from Environment International
#6
of 6,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224
of 458,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment International
#1
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,452,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,604 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.