↓ Skip to main content

Ageing and the self-reference effect in memory

Overview of attention for article published in Memory, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ageing and the self-reference effect in memory
Published in
Memory, November 2007
DOI 10.1080/09658210701701394
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The present study investigates potential age differences in the self-reference effect. Young and older adults incidentally encoded adjectives by deciding whether the adjective described them, described another person (Experiments 1 & 2), was a trait they found desirable (Experiment 3), or was presented in upper case. Like young adults, older adults exhibited superior recognition for self-referenced items relative to the items encoded with the alternate orienting tasks, but self-referencing did not restore their memory to the level of young adults. Furthermore, the self-reference effect was more limited for older adults. Amount of cognitive resource influenced how much older adults benefit from self-referencing, and older adults appeared to extend the strategy less flexibly than young adults. Self-referencing improves older adults' memory, but its benefits are circumscribed despite the social and personally relevant nature of the task.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 155 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 16%
Researcher 25 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Other 9 6%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 38 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 91 57%
Neuroscience 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 40 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2022.
All research outputs
#5,758,839
of 26,485,222 outputs
Outputs from Memory
#366
of 1,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,799
of 90,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,485,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.