You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rethinking foundation species in a changing world: The case for Rhododendron maximum as an emerging foundation species in shifting ecosystems of the southern Appalachians
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Forest Ecology & Management, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118240 |
| Authors |
Maura P. Dudley, Mary Freeman, Seth Wenger, C. Rhett Jackson, Catherine M. Pringle |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
| Researcher | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,848,728
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Forest Ecology & Management
#646
of 5,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,333
of 424,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Ecology & Management
#14
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.