↓ Skip to main content

Global population trends and policy options

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
12 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
632 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Global population trends and policy options
Published in
The Lancet, July 2012
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60696-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Rapid population growth is a threat to wellbeing in the poorest countries, whereas very low fertility increasingly threatens the future welfare of many developed countries. The mapping of global trends in population growth from 2005-10 shows four distinct patterns. Most of the poorest countries, especially in sub-Saharan Africa, are characterised by rapid growth of more than 2% per year. Moderate annual growth of 1-2% is concentrated in large countries, such as India and Indonesia, and across north Africa and western Latin America. Whereas most advanced-economy countries and large middle-income countries, such as China and Brazil, are characterised by low or no growth (0-1% per year), most of eastern Europe, Japan, and a few western European countries are characterised by population decline. Countries with rapid growth face adverse social, economic, and environmental pressures, whereas those with low or negative growth face rapid population ageing, unsustainable burdens on public pensions and health-care systems, and slow economic growth. Countries with rapid growth should consider the implementation of voluntary family planning programmes as their main policy option to reduce the high unmet need for contraception, unwanted pregnancies, and probirth reproductive norms. In countries with low or negative growth, policies to address ageing and very low fertility are still evolving. Further research into the potential effect of demographic policies on other social systems, social groups, and fertility decisions and trends is therefore recommended.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 632 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Madagascar 1 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 613 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 139 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 13%
Researcher 75 12%
Student > Bachelor 47 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 6%
Other 101 16%
Unknown 155 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 113 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 85 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 4%
Engineering 26 4%
Other 144 23%
Unknown 173 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,349,120
of 34,259,606 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#9,535
of 51,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,239
of 213,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#84
of 477 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,259,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 477 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.