| Title |
Is bigger better? An argument for very low starting doses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.091481 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James P McCormack, G Michael Allan, Adil S Virani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 19% |
| Canada | 4 | 13% |
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Australia | 3 | 10% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 58% |
| Scientists | 6 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 23 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#871,984
of 25,440,205 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1,307
of 9,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,482
of 108,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#9
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,440,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.