↓ Skip to main content

Next-Generation Sequencing in Salivary Gland Basal Cell Adenocarcinoma and Basal Cell Adenoma

Overview of attention for article published in Head and Neck Pathology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Next-Generation Sequencing in Salivary Gland Basal Cell Adenocarcinoma and Basal Cell Adenoma
Published in
Head and Neck Pathology, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12105-016-0730-9
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Basal cell adenoma and basal cell adenocarcinoma represent basaloid salivary gland neoplasms that show cyto-morphologic similarity but differ at the histologic level by their invasive qualities, as adenocarcinomas show invasion beyond their capsule, a finding not seen in the adenomas. Due to the low incidence of these tumors, the molecular mechanism underlying their pathogenesis is poorly understood. We sought to further delineate these neoplasms through mutation profiling by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). Twenty cases (basal cell adenocarcinoma = 10; basal cell adenoma = 10) were retrospectively selected from a previous analysis. NGS was performed using the Ion AmpliSeq™ Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). The data was analyzed using the Ion Torrent Suite Software (Life Technologies) followed by a laboratory-developed pipeline. One of eight cases of basal cell adenocarcinoma had a mutation, which was an activating mutation in PIK3CA (c.3140A>G, p.H1047R). No mutations were detected in the remaining basal cell adenocarcinomas. In the basal cell adenomas, the CTNNB1 p.I35T mutation was identified in three of nine (3/9) cases. A missense mutation in the ATM gene (c.2572T>C, p.F858L) was seen in a basal cell adenoma with an allele frequency of 53 %, raising the possibility of a germline mutation. The overall findings suggest that although there is cytomorphologic similarity, differences exist between these two tumors at the histologic and genetic level. Although the numbers of cases are limited, the aberrations in genes affecting different signaling pathways in the basal cell adenocarcinoma versus the basal cell adenomas suggest that basal cell adenocarcinoma likely arises de novo and not from basal cell adenoma.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Student > Master 7 23%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 1 3%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2017.
All research outputs
#10,294,085
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from Head and Neck Pathology
#683
of 1,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,338
of 341,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head and Neck Pathology
#18
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.