↓ Skip to main content

Stressing out over long noncoding RNA

Overview of attention for article published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Stressing out over long noncoding RNA
Published in
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms, July 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2015.06.010
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Genomic studies have revealed that humans possess far fewer protein-encoding genes than originally predicted. These over-estimates were drawn from the inherent developmental and stimuli-responsive complexity found in humans and other mammals, when compared to lower eukaryotic organisms. This left a conceptual void in many cellular networks, as a new class of functional molecules was necessary for "fine-tuning" the basic proteomic machinery. Transcriptomics analyses have determined that the vast majority of the genetic material is transcribed as noncoding RNA, suggesting that these molecules could provide the functional diversity initially sought from proteins. Indeed, as discussed in this review, long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), the largest family of noncoding transcripts, have emerged as common regulators of many cellular stressors; including heat shock, metabolic deprivation and DNA damage. These stimuli, while divergent in nature, share some common stress-responsive pathways, notably inhibition of cell proliferation. This role intrinsically makes stress-responsive lncRNA regulators potential tumor suppressor or proto-oncogenic genes. As the list of functional RNA molecules continues to rapidly expand it is becoming increasingly clear that the significance and functionality of this family may someday rival that of proteins.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Hungary 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 118 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 20%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 7 6%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 14 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 37%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 16 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2016.
All research outputs
#24,998,236
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms
#689
of 782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,920
of 280,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms
#22
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 782 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.