↓ Skip to main content

Brain Function Differences in Children With Type 1 Diabetes: A Functional MRI Study of Working Memory

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Brain Function Differences in Children With Type 1 Diabetes: A Functional MRI Study of Working Memory
Published in
Diabetes, May 2020
DOI 10.2337/db20-0123
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lara C. Foland-Ross, Gabby Tong, Nelly Mauras, Allison Cato, Tandy Aye, Michael Tansey, Neil H. White, Stuart A. Weinzimer, Kimberly Englert, Hanyang Shen, Paul K. Mazaika, Allan L. Reiss, Eva Tsalikian, Michael J. Tansey, Julie Coffey, Joanne Cabbage, Sara Salamat, Rachel Bisbee, Nelly Mauras, Larry A. Fox, Allison Cato, Kim Englert, Kaitlin Sikes, Tina Ewen, Keisha Bird, Bruce A. Buckingham, Darrell M. Wilson, Tandy Aye, Ryan S. Kingman, Stuart A. Weinzimer, William V. Tamborlane, Jodie Ambrosino, Amy Steffen, Kate Weyman, Melinda Zgorski, Neil H. White, Ana Maria Arbelaez, Lucy Levandoski, Angie Starnes, Tamara Hershey, Allan L. Reiss, Lara Foland-Ross, Matthew J. Marzelli, Paul K. Mazaika, Gabby Tong, Mark Sperling, Dorothy M. Becker, Patricia Cleary, Carla Greenbaum, Antoinette Moran

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 2 4%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 29 63%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Neuroscience 4 9%
Psychology 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 28 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2022.
All research outputs
#12,840,845
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes
#6,632
of 9,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,890
of 395,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes
#122
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.