↓ Skip to main content

Daytime Sleepiness and Risk of Stroke and Vascular Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Daytime Sleepiness and Risk of Stroke and Vascular Disease
Published in
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes, July 2012
DOI 10.1161/circoutcomes.111.963801
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that poor quality and diminished quantity of sleep may be independently linked to vascular events although prospective and multiethnic studies are limited. This study aimed to explore the relationship between daytime sleepiness and the risk of ischemic stroke and vascular events in an elderly, multiethnic prospective cohort.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Croatia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 79 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 24 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 25 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2025.
All research outputs
#4,441,362
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
#959
of 1,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,348
of 213,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.