↓ Skip to main content

What Is the Test-Retest Reliability of Common Task-Functional MRI Measures? New Empirical Evidence and a Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
36 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
359 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
24 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator
bluesky
1 Bluesky user
podcasts
2 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
752 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
What Is the Test-Retest Reliability of Common Task-Functional MRI Measures? New Empirical Evidence and a Meta-Analysis
Published in
Psychological Science, June 2020
DOI 10.1177/0956797620916786
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 359 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 752 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 752 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 142 19%
Researcher 123 16%
Student > Master 69 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 50 7%
Student > Bachelor 49 7%
Other 130 17%
Unknown 189 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 178 24%
Neuroscience 143 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 4%
Engineering 19 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 3%
Other 100 13%
Unknown 261 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 579. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2026.
All research outputs
#51,731
of 34,602,740 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science
#111
of 4,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,830
of 461,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,602,740 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 86.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.