↓ Skip to main content

White matter hyperintensity burden in acute stroke patients differs by ischemic stroke subtype.

Overview of attention for article published in Neurology, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
24 X users

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
White matter hyperintensity burden in acute stroke patients differs by ischemic stroke subtype.
Published in
Neurology, June 2020
DOI 10.1212/wnl.0000000000009728
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne-Katrin Giese, Markus D. Schirmer, Adrian V. Dalca, Ramesh Sridharan, Kathleen L. Donahue, Marco Nardin, Robert Irie, Elissa C. McIntosh, Steven J.T. Mocking, Huichun Xu, John W. Cole, Eva Giralt-Steinhauer, Jordi Jimenez-Conde, Christina Jern, Dawn O. Kleindorfer, Robin Lemmens, Johan Wasselius, Arne Lindgren, Tatjana Rundek, Ralph L. Sacco, Reinhold Schmidt, Pankaj Sharma, Agnieszka Slowik, Vincent Thijs, Bradford B. Worrall, Daniel Woo, Steven J. Kittner, Patrick F. McArdle, Braxton D. Mitchell, Jonathan Rosand, James F. Meschia, Ona Wu, Polina Golland, Natalia S. Rost, Anne-Katrin Giese, Markus D Schirmer, Adrian V Dalca, Ramesh Sridharan, Kathleen L Donahue, Marco Nardin, Robert Irie, Elissa C McIntos, Steven J.T. Mocking, Huichun Xu, John W Cole, Eva Giralt-Steinhauer, Jordi- Jimenez-Conde, Christina Jern, Dawn O Kleindorfer, Robin Lemmens, Johan Wasselius, Arne Lindgren, Tatjana Rundek, Ralph L Sacco, Reinhold Schmidt, Pankaj Sharma, Agnieszka Slowik, Vincent Thijs, Bradford B Worrall, Daniel Woo, Patrick F McArdle, Braxton D Mitchell, Jonathan Rosand

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Master 5 5%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 37 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 23%
Unspecified 12 12%
Neuroscience 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 40 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,875,965
of 29,783,697 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#3,259
of 23,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,221
of 438,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#105
of 447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,783,697 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.