↓ Skip to main content

SUSCEPTIBILITY OF GREATER SAGE-GROUSE TO EXPERIMENTAL INFECTION WITH WEST NILE VIRUS

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Diseases, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
SUSCEPTIBILITY OF GREATER SAGE-GROUSE TO EXPERIMENTAL INFECTION WITH WEST NILE VIRUS
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Diseases, January 2006
DOI 10.7589/0090-3558-42.1.14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 60 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Other 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 27%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 16%
Environmental Science 7 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Computer Science 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,939,339
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#146
of 1,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,370
of 186,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them