| Title |
Filtration evaluation and clinical use of expired elastomeric P-100 filter cartridges during the COVID-19 pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online), May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1017/ice.2020.257 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 65% |
| Scientists | 8 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 18% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2026.
All research outputs
#2,671,339
of 34,378,656 outputs
Outputs from Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online)
#869
of 6,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,942
of 457,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online)
#27
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,378,656 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.