| Title |
When should we expect early bursts of trait evolution in comparative data? Predictions from an evolutionary food web model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Evolutionary Biology, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02566.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
Conceptual models of adaptive radiation predict that competitive interactions among species will result in an early burst of speciation and trait evolution followed by a slowdown in diversification rates. Empirical studies often show early accumulation of lineages in phylogenetic trees, but usually fail to detect early bursts of phenotypic evolution. We use an evolutionary simulation model to assemble food webs through adaptive radiation, and examine patterns in the resulting phylogenetic trees and species' traits (body size and trophic position). We find that when foraging trade-offs result in food webs where all species occupy integer trophic levels, lineage diversity and trait disparity are concentrated early in the tree, consistent with the early burst model. In contrast, in food webs in which many omnivorous species feed at multiple trophic levels, high levels of turnover of species' identities and traits tend to eliminate the early burst signal. These results suggest testable predictions about how the niche structure of ecological communities may be reflected by macroevolutionary patterns. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 137 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 23% |
| Researcher | 29 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 99 | 65% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 14% |