↓ Skip to main content

When should we expect early bursts of trait evolution in comparative data? Predictions from an evolutionary food web model

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Evolutionary Biology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
When should we expect early bursts of trait evolution in comparative data? Predictions from an evolutionary food web model
Published in
Journal of Evolutionary Biology, July 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02566.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Conceptual models of adaptive radiation predict that competitive interactions among species will result in an early burst of speciation and trait evolution followed by a slowdown in diversification rates. Empirical studies often show early accumulation of lineages in phylogenetic trees, but usually fail to detect early bursts of phenotypic evolution. We use an evolutionary simulation model to assemble food webs through adaptive radiation, and examine patterns in the resulting phylogenetic trees and species' traits (body size and trophic position). We find that when foraging trade-offs result in food webs where all species occupy integer trophic levels, lineage diversity and trait disparity are concentrated early in the tree, consistent with the early burst model. In contrast, in food webs in which many omnivorous species feed at multiple trophic levels, high levels of turnover of species' identities and traits tend to eliminate the early burst signal. These results suggest testable predictions about how the niche structure of ecological communities may be reflected by macroevolutionary patterns.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 4 3%
United States 2 1%
Portugal 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 137 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 23%
Researcher 29 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 11%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 17 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 99 65%
Environmental Science 10 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 4%
Physics and Astronomy 3 2%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 21 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2012.
All research outputs
#19,223,153
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Evolutionary Biology
#2,495
of 2,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,662
of 167,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Evolutionary Biology
#20
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.