↓ Skip to main content

Disruptions during a pandemic: Gaps identified and lessons learned

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Dental Education, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
Article details
Title
Disruptions during a pandemic: Gaps identified and lessons learned
Published in
Journal of Dental Education, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/jdd.12236
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Global disruptions caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects all walks of life, and dentistry and dental education are no exceptions. Dental education uniquely blends didactic courses and hands-on clinical training seamlessly to prepare oral healthcare providers of the future. Apart from economical and access to care implications, closure of all the dental institutions in the United States affects their educational mission greatly, equally disturbing pre-doctoral and graduate training. Efforts are ongoing to continue the educational mission in dental institutions by delivering scheduled course content remotely using multiple online tools. In spite of those efforts, since clinical experiences cannot be completely replaced by any available alternative method of instruction that is delivered remotely, students are missing out on valuable patient-based clinical experiences. In this perspective article, we briefly discuss the several implications of COVID-19, in the context of dental education. We then highlight some of the lessons we can learn from this pandemic which we hope will have several positive implications, including curricular changes, increased public health awareness and preparedness for future public health emergencies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history

Loading chart data

Monthly Attention Score data from August 2022 to July 2025. Daily data from 25 July 2025.

An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.

No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.

Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 226 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Researcher 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 5%
Other 53 23%
Unknown 89 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 31%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 94 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2020.
All research outputs
#20,622,845
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Dental Education
#1,050
of 1,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#340,544
of 398,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Dental Education
#32
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,179 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.