You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pile-nappe structure of the Ryokami-yama chert unit in the Chichibu composite terrane of the Kanto Mountains, central Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, January 2003
|
| DOI | 10.5575/geosoc.109.324 |
| Authors |
Kazuhiro Yoshida, Atsushi Matsuoka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,953,339
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Geological Society of Japan
#69
of 604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,717
of 139,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Geological Society of Japan
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 604 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them