↓ Skip to main content

Unintended consequences of cigarette price changes for alcohol drinking behaviors across age groups: evidence from pooled cross sections

Overview of attention for article published in Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Unintended consequences of cigarette price changes for alcohol drinking behaviors across age groups: evidence from pooled cross sections
Published in
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1747-597x-7-28
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Raising prices through taxation on tobacco and alcohol products is a common strategy to raise revenues and reduce consumption. However, taxation policies are product specific, focusing either on alcohol or tobacco products. Several studies document interactions between the price of cigarettes and general alcohol use and it is important to know whether increased cigarette prices are associated with varying alcohol drinking patterns among different population groups. To inform policymaking, this study investigates the association of state cigarette prices with smoking, and current, binge, and heavy drinking by age group.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Master 7 19%
Librarian 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 22%
Social Sciences 7 19%
Psychology 5 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2012.
All research outputs
#15,588,337
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
#568
of 761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,696
of 180,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.