| Title |
Mobile stroke unit versus standard medical care in the management of patients with acute stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Stroke, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1747493020929964 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nida Fatima, Maher Saqqur, M Shazam Hussain, Ashfaq Shuaib |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 147 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 23 | 16% |
| Australia | 21 | 14% |
| United States | 18 | 12% |
| Canada | 11 | 7% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 50 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 84 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 38 | 26% |
| Scientists | 21 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2022.
All research outputs
#395,488
of 25,210,618 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Stroke
#14
of 1,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,920
of 404,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Stroke
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,210,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.