↓ Skip to main content

APPLYING ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA TO MARINE RESERVE DESIGN: A CASE STUDY FROM THE CALIFORNIA CHANNEL ISLANDS

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, February 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
612 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
APPLYING ECOLOGICAL CRITERIA TO MARINE RESERVE DESIGN: A CASE STUDY FROM THE CALIFORNIA CHANNEL ISLANDS
Published in
Ecological Applications, February 2003
DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0170:aectmr]2.0.co;2
Authors

Satie Airamé, Jenifer E. Dugan, Kevin D. Lafferty, Heather Leslie, Deborah A. McArdle, Robert R. Warner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 612 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 3%
Brazil 9 1%
Australia 7 1%
Portugal 5 <1%
Mexico 4 <1%
South Africa 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Other 19 3%
Unknown 541 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 132 22%
Researcher 132 22%
Student > Master 106 17%
Student > Bachelor 57 9%
Other 42 7%
Other 104 17%
Unknown 39 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 290 47%
Environmental Science 187 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 32 5%
Social Sciences 14 2%
Computer Science 6 <1%
Other 27 4%
Unknown 56 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,907,044
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#996
of 3,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,642
of 144,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.