↓ Skip to main content

Toward Plasmonic Polymers

Overview of attention for article published in Nano Letters, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Toward Plasmonic Polymers
Published in
Nano Letters, July 2012
DOI 10.1021/nl3011512
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We establish the concept of a plasmonic polymer, whose collective optical properties depend on the repeat unit. Experimental and theoretical analyses of the super- and sub- radiant plasmon response of plasmonic polymers comprising repeat units of single nanoparticles or dimers of gold nanoparticles show that (1) the redshift of the lowest energy coupled mode becomes minimal as the chain approaches the infinite chain limit at a length of ∼10 particles, (2) the presence and energy of the modes are sensitive to the geometries of the constituents, that is, repeat unit, but (3) spatial disorder and nanoparticle heterogeneity have only small effects on the super-radiant mode.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
France 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 147 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 39%
Researcher 30 19%
Student > Master 13 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Professor 7 4%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 14 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 53 34%
Physics and Astronomy 41 26%
Materials Science 22 14%
Engineering 17 11%
Chemical Engineering 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 19 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,786,617
of 31,266,886 outputs
Outputs from Nano Letters
#1,872
of 15,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,574
of 196,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano Letters
#35
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,266,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.