↓ Skip to main content

Large-scale replication and heterogeneity in Parkinson disease genetic loci

Overview of attention for article published in Neurology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Large-scale replication and heterogeneity in Parkinson disease genetic loci
Published in
Neurology, July 2012
DOI 10.1212/wnl.0b013e318264e353
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manu Sharma, John P.A. Ioannidis, Jan O. Aasly, Grazia Annesi, Alexis Brice, Christine Van Broeckhoven, Lars Bertram, Maria Bozi, David Crosiers, Carl Clarke, Maurizio Facheris, Matthew Farrer, Gaetan Garraux, Suzana Gispert, Georg Auburger, Carles Vilariño-Güell, Georgios M. Hadjigeorgiou, Andrew A. Hicks, Nobutaka Hattori, Beom Jeon, Suzanne Lesage, Christina M. Lill, Juei-Jueng Lin, Timothy Lynch, Peter Lichtner, Anthony E. Lang, Vincent Mok, Barbara Jasinska-Myga, George D. Mellick, Karen E. Morrison, Grzegorz Opala, Peter P. Pramstaller, Irene Pichler, Sung Sup Park, Aldo Quattrone, Ekaterina Rogaeva, Owen A. Ross, Leonidas Stefanis, Joanne D. Stockton, Wataru Satake, Peter A. Silburn, Jessie Theuns, Eng-King Tan, Tatsushi Toda, Hiroyuki Tomiyama, Ryan J. Uitti, Karin Wirdefeldt, Zbigniew Wszolek, Georgia Xiromerisiou, Kuo-Chu Yueh, Yi Zhao, Thomas Gasser, Demetrius Maraganore, Rejko Krüger, R.S Boyle, A Sellbach, J.D. O'Sullivan, G.T. Sutherland, G.A Siebert, N.N.W Dissanayaka, Christine Van Broeckhoven, Jessie Theuns, David Crosiers, Barbara Pickut, Sebastiaan Engelborghs, Bram Meeus, Peter P. De Deyn, Patrick Cras, Ekaterina Rogaeva, Anthony E Lang, Y Agid, M Anheim, A-M Bonnet, M Borg, A Brice, E Broussolle, JC Corvol, P Damier, A Destée, A Dürr, F Durif, S Lesage, E Lohmann, P Pollak, O Rascol, F Tison, C Tranchant, F Viallet, M Vidailhet, Christophe Tzourio, Philippe Amouyel, Marie-Anne Loriot, Eugénie Mutez, Aurélie Duflot, Jean-Philippe Legendre, Nawal Waucquier, Thomas Gasser, Olaf Riess, Daniela Berg, Claudia Schulte, Christine Klein, Ana Djarmati, Johann Hagenah, Katja Lohmann, Georg Auburger, Rüdiger Hilker, Simone van de Loo, Efthimios Dardiotis, Vaia Tsimourtou, Styliani Ralli, Persa Kountra, Gianna Patramani, Cristina Vogiatzi, Nobutaka Hattori, Hiroyuki Tomiyama, Manabu Funayama, Hiroyo Yoshino, Yuanzhe Li, Yoko Imamichi, Tatsushi Toda, Wataru Satake, Tim Lynch, J. Mark Gibson, Enza Maria Valente, Alessandro Ferraris, Bruno Dallapiccola, Tamara Ialongo, Laura Brighina, Barbara Corradi, Roberto Piolti, Patrizia Tarantino, Ferdinanda Annesi, Beom S. Jeon, Sung-Sup Park, J Aasly, Grzegorz Opala, Barbara Jasinska-Myga, Gabriela Klodowska-Duda, Magdalena Boczarska-Jedynak, Eng King Tan, Andrea Carmine Belin, Lars Olson, Dagmar Galter, Marie Westerlund, Olof Sydow, Christer Nilsson, Andreas Puschmann, JJ Lin, Demetrius M. Maraganore, J, Eric Ahlskog, Mariza de Andrade, Timothy G. Lesnick, Walter A. Rocca, Harvey Checkoway, Owen A Ross, Zbigniew K. Wszolek, Ryan J. Uitti

Abstract

Eleven genetic loci have reached genome-wide significance in a recent meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies in Parkinson disease (PD) based on populations of Caucasian descent. The extent to which these genetic effects are consistent across different populations is unknown.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 159 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 14%
Other 15 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 9%
Student > Master 13 8%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 40 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 12%
Neuroscience 16 9%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 51 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,279,992
of 34,054,827 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#10,800
of 26,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,571
of 212,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#74
of 312 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,054,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 312 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.