You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Historical museum collections and contemporary population studies implicate roads and introduced predatory bullfrogs in the decline of western pond turtles
|
---|---|
Published in |
PeerJ, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.7717/peerj.9248 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
E. Griffin Nicholson, Stephanie Manzo, Zachary Devereux, Thomas Paul Morgan, Robert N. Fisher, Christopher Brown, Rosi Dagit, Peter A. Scott, H. Bradley Shaffer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Central African Republic | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 44% |
Researcher | 6 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 40% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 32% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 4 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,575,046
of 25,468,789 outputs
Outputs from PeerJ
#6,851
of 15,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,547
of 434,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PeerJ
#209
of 437 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,789 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 437 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.