↓ Skip to main content

Culinary Cultural Conservation and Cultural Keystone Food Groups: Concepts in Ethnobotany

Overview of attention for article published in Human Ecology, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Culinary Cultural Conservation and Cultural Keystone Food Groups: Concepts in Ethnobotany
Published in
Human Ecology, March 2020
DOI 10.1007/s10745-020-00137-5
Authors

David William Taylor, Gregory J. Anderson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Lecturer 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 10 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 22%
Environmental Science 6 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 10 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,442,216
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Human Ecology
#192
of 794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,227
of 364,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Ecology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.