| Title |
CONDOR: a database resource of developmentally associated conserved non-coding elements
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Developmental Biology, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-213x-7-100 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam Woolfe, Debbie K Goode, Julie Cooke, Heather Callaway, Sarah Smith, Phil Snell, Gayle K McEwen, Greg Elgar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| Brazil | 4 | 4% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Hungary | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Professor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 63% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,268,321
of 23,215,490 outputs
Outputs from BMC Developmental Biology
#68
of 371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,826
of 69,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Developmental Biology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,215,490 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 371 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.