↓ Skip to main content

Functional Outcomes of Adult Patients With West Nile Virus Admitted to a Rehabilitation Hospital

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Functional Outcomes of Adult Patients With West Nile Virus Admitted to a Rehabilitation Hospital
Published in
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, April 2013
DOI 10.1519/jpt.0b013e318258bcba
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The clinical manifestation of West Nile Virus (WNV) varies in individuals from mild flu-like symptoms to acute flaccid paralysis. Advanced age is the most significant risk factor for developing severe neurological disease and for death. The broad range of neurologic symptoms associated with WNV infection leads to varied body structure and function limitations and participation restrictions that may require rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to describe the functional impairments upon admission and the functional outcomes at discharge of 48 adult patients admitted with WNV to a rehabilitation facility in the Midwest from 2002 to 2009.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Researcher 8 10%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 19 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 21 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy
#333
of 491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,676
of 212,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.