↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Hydroxyl Radical Diffusion and Acidified Thiourea as a Scavenger during Intracoronal Bleaching

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Endodontics, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evaluation of Hydroxyl Radical Diffusion and Acidified Thiourea as a Scavenger during Intracoronal Bleaching
Published in
Journal of Endodontics, May 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.joen.2016.04.010
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The diffusion of hydroxyl radicals in intracoronal bleaching is associated with a risk of invasive cervical resorption. The use of acidified thiourea has been recommended as a scavenger of residual radicals generated during intracoronal bleaching. The aims of this study were to quantify hydroxyl radical diffusion to external root surfaces after intracoronal bleaching with commonly used materials and to evaluate the effect of using acidified thiourea with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) on hydroxyl radical diffusion. Eighty-two human premolars were prepared, stained, root filled, and allocated to experimental and control groups as follows: group 1: sodium perborate (SP) and water (n = 21), group 2: H2O2 (n = 21), group 3: acidified thiourea and H2O2 (n = 21), group 4: neutral thiourea and H2O2 (n = 10), control group 1: negative control (water) (n = 10), and control group 2: positive control (SP and H2O2) (n = 10). Materials were placed into the pulp chamber, sealed, and placed in 5 mmol/L terephthalic acid at 37°C for 48 hours. Hydroxyl radicals were quantified using a fluorescence microplate reader and high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. The H2O2 and SP mixture resulted in the greatest hydroxyl radical diffusion and was significantly greater than SP and water (P < .05) and H2O2 (P < .05). The addition of acidified thiourea resulted in higher radical diffusion, whereas the addition of neutral thiourea resulted in lower diffusion than H2O2 alone. The SP and water mixture resulted in the lowest hydroxyl radical diffusion, and the H2O2 and SP mixture resulted in the greatest. Although the addition of acidified thiourea to H2O2 did not reduce radicals detected, the addition of neutral thiourea had a positive effect.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 12 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 15 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Endodontics
#2,011
of 2,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,327
of 350,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Endodontics
#31
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,291 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.