↓ Skip to main content

風評被害のポリティクス――名づけの〈傲慢さ〉をめぐって――

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Sociology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
風評被害のポリティクス――名づけの〈傲慢さ〉をめぐって――
Published in
Journal of Environmental Sociology, December 2014
DOI 10.24779/jpkankyo.20.0_54
Authors

三浦 耕吉郎

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,799,346
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Sociology
#3
of 30 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,070
of 371,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Sociology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one scored the same or higher as 27 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them