| Title |
Multicellular 3D Neurovascular Unit Model for Assessing Hypoxia and Neuroinflammation Induced Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-66487-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Goodwell Nzou, Robert T. Wicks, Nicole R. VanOstrand, Gehad A. Mekky, Stephanie A. Seale, Aya EL-Taibany, Elizabeth E. Wicks, Carl M. Nechtman, Eric J. Marrotte, Vishruti S. Makani, Sean V. Murphy, M. C. Seeds, John D. Jackson, Anthony J. Atala |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 20% |
| France | 2 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 15% |
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 33 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 17 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#678,401
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#7,381
of 142,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,765
of 436,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#248
of 3,914 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,914 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.