↓ Skip to main content

The Gift That Keeps on Giving: Increasing Donation Rates by Offering Incentives

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Transplantation, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Gift That Keeps on Giving: Increasing Donation Rates by Offering Incentives
Published in
American Journal of Transplantation, May 2016
DOI 10.1111/ajt.13850
Pubmed ID
Authors

D.S. Goldberg, J.D. Trotter

Abstract

Across the globe, there is a shortage of donor organs for patients with end-stage organ disease. In most countries, organ donation is stagnant. Over the years, different approaches have been attempted with variable success. Most have focused on media appeals to encourage organ donation. A more direct means to try to improve organ donation would be to reward individuals who either agree to donate (in the event of their brain death) or authorized donation of their next-of-kin. For example, in Singapore (which has an 'opt out' organ donation system, whereby, all citizens are considered eligible for donation unless they formally 'opt out' of consideration), priority for transplant is given to individuals who have not opted out (1). A different system was recently implemented in Israel where citizens were rewarded for either donor registration or authorizing donation for their next-of-kin. Israel, like most countries has an 'opt in' donation system whereby organ donation is not presumed and requires specific authorization by registration of the individual (prior to brain death) or authorization by next-of-kin. Specifically, the Israeli law provided two incentives: 1) patients waitlisted for solid-organ transplant who had previously registered as an organ donor > 3 years before listing received higher transplant priority; and 2) first-degree relatives of individuals who either donated an organ while alive or authorized donation for their next-of-kin were granted higher transplant priority. Stoler et al. reviewed changes in organ donation before and after implementation of this novel national policy (2). This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 29%
Philosophy 1 7%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,473,281
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Transplantation
#3,014
of 5,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,456
of 350,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Transplantation
#42
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.