↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Simple and Quantitative Method to Predict Symptomatic Vasospasm After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Based on Computed Tomography: Beyond the Fisher Scale
Published in
Neurosurgery, October 2012
DOI 10.1227/neu.0b013e318267360f
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although the Fisher scale is commonly used to grade vasospasm risk in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) patients, it fails to account for increasing subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) thickness.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 120 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 18%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Other 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 30 25%
Unknown 29 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 48%
Neuroscience 16 13%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 38 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2012.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neurosurgery
#4,823
of 5,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,527
of 190,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurosurgery
#37
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.