↓ Skip to main content

Intramucosal Bacterial Microcolonies Exist in Chronic Rhinosinusitis without Inducing a Local Immune Response

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Intramucosal Bacterial Microcolonies Exist in Chronic Rhinosinusitis without Inducing a Local Immune Response
Published in
American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy, July 2012
DOI 10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3779
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) causes very significant morbidity, much about its pathogenesis remains uncertain. Recent studies have identified polymicrobial biofilms on the surface of sinus mucosa and Staphylococcus aureus within the sinus mucosa of patients with CRS, both with and without nasal polyps. The pathogenic implications of intramucosal bacteria in CRS are unknown. This study was designed to determine the prevalence and species of bacterial colonies within the sinus mucosa of adult patients with and without CRS and to describe the relationship of these bacterial colonies to the host immune response.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 10%
Unspecified 2 4%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#5,352,885
of 28,775,965 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy
#357
of 1,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,571
of 184,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,775,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.