Baculovirus holds promise for genetic modification of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) and bone engineering. To explore the immune responses during bone healing and the cell fate, ASCs were mock-transduced (Mock group), transduced with the baculovirus transiently expressing growth factors promoting osteogenesis (BMP2) or angiogenesis (VEGF) (S group), or transduced with hybrid baculoviruses persistently expressing BMP2/VEGF (L group). After allotransplantation into massive femoral defects in rabbits, these 3 groups triggered similar degrees of transient inflammatory response (e.g. neutrophil proliferation and immune cell infiltration into the graft site), revealing that baculovirus and transgene products did not exacerbate the inflammation. The cells in all 3 groups underwent apoptosis initially, persisted for at least 4 weeks and were eradicated thereafter. The L group prolonged the in vivo BMP2/VEGF expression (up to 4 weeks), extended the antibody responses, and slightly enhanced the cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Nonetheless, the L group led to remarkably better bone healing and remodeling than the Mock and S groups. These data confirmed that the ASCs engineered with the hybrid BV imparted prolonged expression of BMP2/VEGF which, although stimulated low levels of humoral and cell-mediated immune responses, essentially augmented the healing of massive segmental bone defects.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2012.
All research outputs
#24,993,796
of 27,776,330 outputs
Outputs from Biomaterials
#10,545
of 11,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,597
of 184,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomaterials
#149
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,776,330 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
