↓ Skip to main content

The TIDieR Checklist Will Benefit the Physical Therapy Profession.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The TIDieR Checklist Will Benefit the Physical Therapy Profession.
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, June 2016
DOI 10.2519/jospt.2016.0108
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The TIDieR (template for intervention description and replication) checklist and guide were developed to improve the reporting of interventions in any evaluative study, including randomized trials. The checklist contains 12 items and was developed as an extension to the CONSORT 2010 and SPIRIT 2013 statements to provide further guidance for authors on the key information to include in trial reports. Incomplete reporting of interventions in physical therapy studies is an important problem, and we endorse the use of the TIDieR checklist as a potential solution. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016;46(6):402-404. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.0108.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 22%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Professor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 24%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 16 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2017.
All research outputs
#11,239,968
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#1,724
of 2,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,557
of 344,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#30
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.