↓ Skip to main content

Carbon and energy fluxes in cropland ecosystems: a model-data comparison

Overview of attention for article published in Biogeochemistry, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carbon and energy fluxes in cropland ecosystems: a model-data comparison
Published in
Biogeochemistry, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10533-016-0219-3
Authors

E. Lokupitiya, A. S. Denning, K. Schaefer, D. Ricciuto, R. Anderson, M. A. Arain, I. Baker, A. G. Barr, G. Chen, J. M. Chen, P. Ciais, D. R. Cook, M. Dietze, M. El Maayar, M. Fischer, R. Grant, D. Hollinger, C. Izaurralde, A. Jain, C. Kucharik, Z. Li, S. Liu, L. Li, R. Matamala, P. Peylin, D. Price, S. W. Running, A. Sahoo, M. Sprintsin, A. E. Suyker, H. Tian, C. Tonitto, M. Torn, Hans Verbeeck, S. B. Verma, Y. Xue

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Professor 4 5%
Student > Master 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 23 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 19 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 14%
Engineering 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 27 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,564,655
of 23,325,355 outputs
Outputs from Biogeochemistry
#708
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,965
of 340,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeochemistry
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,325,355 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.