| Title |
Mapping fatal police violence across U.S. metropolitan areas: Overall rates and racial/ethnic inequities, 2013-2017
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0229686 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 285 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 110 | 39% |
| Canada | 7 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Antarctica | 2 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Unknown | 141 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 233 | 82% |
| Scientists | 28 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 15 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 143 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 62 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 30 | 21% |
| Psychology | 13 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 70 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1095. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2026.
All research outputs
#17,220
of 34,307,719 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#248
of 224,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#682
of 463,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3
of 2,797 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,307,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,797 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.