↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Commensurate CO2 Capture, and Shape Selectivity for HCCH over H2CCH2, in Zigzag Channels of a Robust CuI(CN)(L) Metal–Organic Framework
Published in
Inorganic Chemistry, June 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b00813
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A novel copper(I) metal-organic framework (MOF), {[Cu(I)2(py-pzpypz)2(μ-CN)2]·MeCN}n (1·MeCN), with an unusual topology is shown to be robust, retaining crystallinity during desolvation to give 1, which has also been structurally characterized [py-pzpypz is 4-(4-pyridyl)-2,5-dipyrazylpyridine)]. Zigzag-shaped channels, which in 1·MeCN were occupied by disordered MeCN molecules, run along the c axis of 1, resulting in a significant solvent-accessible void space (9.6% of the unit cell volume). These tight zigzags, bordered by (Cu(I)CN)n chains, make 1 an ideal candidate for investigations into shape-based selectivity. MOF 1 shows a moderate enthalpy of adsorption for binding CO2 (-32 kJ mol(-1) at moderate loadings), which results in a good selectivity for CO2 over N2 of 4.8:1 under real-world operating conditions of a 15:85 CO2/N2 mixture at 1 bar. Furthermore, 1 was investigated for shape-based selectivity of small hydrocarbons, revealing preferential uptake of linear acetylene gas over ethylene and methane, partially due to kinetic trapping of the guests with larger kinetic diameters.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 8 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 8 38%
Chemical Engineering 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Materials Science 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,265,823
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Inorganic Chemistry
#11,716
of 21,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,901
of 339,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inorganic Chemistry
#87
of 373 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,703 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 373 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.