↓ Skip to main content

RB-Pathway Disruption Is Associated with Improved Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
RB-Pathway Disruption Is Associated with Improved Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, September 2012
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-0903
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We sought to determine whether dysregulation of the retinoblastoma (RB) tumor suppressor pathway was associated with improved response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 26%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Unspecified 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2017.
All research outputs
#9,008,366
of 30,598,342 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#7,730
of 15,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,759
of 191,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#72
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,598,342 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.