↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Effects of Combined Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosterone System Inhibitor and Beta-Blocker Treatment on Outcomes in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Insights from BIOSTAT-CHF and ASIAN-HF…

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Heart Failure, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
2 patents
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Combined Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosterone System Inhibitor and Beta-Blocker Treatment on Outcomes in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Insights from BIOSTAT-CHF and ASIAN-HF Registries
Published in
European Journal of Heart Failure, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/ejhf.1869
Pubmed ID
32583922
Authors

Wouter Ouwerkerk, Tiew-Hwa K. Teng, Jasper Tromp, Wan Ting Tay, John G. Cleland, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, Kenneth Dickstein, Leong L. Ng, Chim C. Lang, Stefan D. Anker, Faiez Zannad, Chung-Lieh Hung, Jitendra P.S. Sawhney, Ajay Naik, Wataru Shimizu, Nobuhisa Hagiwara, Gurpreet Singh Wander, Inder Anand, A. Mark Richards, Adriaan A. Voors, Carolyn S.P. Lam

View on publisher site

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 24 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 28 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2025.
All research outputs
#4,851,797
of 34,115,020 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Heart Failure
#1,285
of 3,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,876
of 462,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Heart Failure
#40
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,115,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.