| Title |
Thinking Outside the Inbox: Use of Slack in Clinical Groups as a Collaborative Team Communication Platform
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
AEM Education and Training: A Global Journal of Emergency Care, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/aet2.10497 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 43% |
| Canada | 4 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 57% |
| Scientists | 5 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 43 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 45 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,271,214
of 34,378,656 outputs
Outputs from AEM Education and Training: A Global Journal of Emergency Care
#79
of 860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,262
of 456,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AEM Education and Training: A Global Journal of Emergency Care
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,378,656 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.