↓ Skip to main content

Genetic diversity and demographic instability in Riftia pachyptilatubeworms from eastern Pacific hydrothermal vents

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic diversity and demographic instability in Riftia pachyptilatubeworms from eastern Pacific hydrothermal vents
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-11-96
Pubmed ID
Authors

D Katharine Coykendall, Shannon B Johnson, Stephen A Karl, Richard A Lutz, Robert C Vrijenhoek

Abstract

Deep-sea hydrothermal vent animals occupy patchy and ephemeral habitats supported by chemosynthetic primary production. Volcanic and tectonic activities controlling the turnover of these habitats contribute to demographic instability that erodes genetic variation within and among colonies of these animals. We examined DNA sequences from one mitochondrial and three nuclear gene loci to assess genetic diversity in the siboglinid tubeworm, Riftia pachyptila, a widely distributed constituent of vents along the East Pacific Rise and Galápagos Rift.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
South Africa 2 2%
Austria 1 1%
Burkina Faso 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
Unknown 79 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 58%
Environmental Science 9 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Unspecified 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 15 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,833
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,765
of 120,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#26
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.