Is authorship sufficient for today’s collaborative research? A call for contributor roles

@isbellHFh @roydanroy @miniapeur @TaliaRinger @aryehazan @avt_im @BlackHC I recently read up on this. Good content out there: https://t.co/66zu9ASyNC

@roydanroy @miniapeur @TaliaRinger @aryehazan @avt_im @BlackHC Related: CRediT or other contribution role taxonomies + individual items to support claimed role justification. A good paper on roles etc: https://t.co/Uey2XSuFCj

@NJCFarrell @ivancedric_a This is where we all are hopefully headed: https://t.co/DppswJRla5

@melsyjs @ivancedric_a Good point and these are the most generic guidelines out there (from ICMJE). They are not the "best" we can do. Journals are changing their requirements (eg. CRediT system by Elsevier) but we would probably need to go even further…

Nice overview of the current status of #research #contributions: https://t.co/VY5cErspHh @N_Vasilevsky & #Attribution Working Group of @force11rescomm. Sociotech, incentives for different parties, & clarity about API openness. See also their #da…

RT @RickyPo: Is authorship sufficient for today’s collaborative research? A call for contributor roles https://t.co/YbdoCmfoKP

Is authorship sufficient for today’s collaborative research? A call for contributor roles https://t.co/8CzAbqh7EY

RT @monicamorrisong: Which "roles and actions power research forward"? useful insights from @N_Vasilevsky @mhmd_hosseini and others at @for…

RT @data2health: Congratulations to @ontowonka @kristiholmes @N_Vasilevsky for this informative and important work published in Accountabil…

Congratulations to @ontowonka @kristiholmes @N_Vasilevsky for this informative and important work published in Accountability in Research! Kudos to you and your team. #Attribution #PublicationEthics #Authorship #CD2H https://t.co/jLtYPPE2Gv https://t.co…

A thoughtful review of the challenges of systematically recognizing contributorship, and a proposed ontology to link CREDIT contributor roles with research objects . https://t.co/iHxSm3bBBf

RT @LizzieGadd: Interesting #CRediT piece but it doesn’t address important questions such as the legal basis for authorship, the sustainabi…

RT @NISOInfo: Great overview of the issues - we’re excited to be working with you & the #CRediT team to formalize it as a standard Liz! htt…

#CRediT with #provenance - Hmmmm @NISOInfo consideration for #CRediT v2...

“The adoption of contributor roles can make it easier to more transparently identify and credit the whole team, catalyzing the necessary cultural shift to evolve scholarship to grow toward open knowledge infrastructures” #academiclibrarians https://t.c…

RT @RickyPo: Is authorship sufficient for today’s collaborative research? A call for contributor roles https://t.co/YbdoCmfoKP

Is authorship sufficient for today’s collaborative research? A call for contributor roles https://t.co/IBYPuhjCYs

RT @ucylpay: An ongoing debate @DavidPriceUCL @UCLLibraries

Which "roles and actions power research forward"? useful insights from @N_Vasilevsky @mhmd_hosseini and others at @force11rescomm about authorship vs contributor-ship in scholarly publishing https://t.co/d8Zws0EbfK @casrai https://t.co/fUB6RIJ3UZ

An ongoing debate @DavidPriceUCL @UCLLibraries

RT @BUSCUSC: Un artigo onde se propón unha nova taxonomía para a identificación dos coautores dos artigos científicos e a avaliación da súa…

Un artigo onde se propón unha nova taxonomía para a identificación dos coautores dos artigos científicos e a avaliación da súa participación.

Interesting #CRediT piece but it doesn’t address important questions such as the legal basis for authorship, the sustainability of contributor role taxonomies, whether we really want more refined author metrics & who owns this data. 👉🏻 https://t.co/…

RT @RickyPo: Is authorship sufficient for today’s collaborative research? A call for contributor roles https://t.co/YbdoCmfoKP

Is authorship sufficient for today’s collaborative research? A call for contributor roles https://t.co/YbdoCmfoKP

PROPOSAL: https://t.co/ozEJI5mHNT "We also introduce the Contributor Attribution Model (CAM), which provides a simple data model that relates the contributor to research objects via the role that they played, as well as the provenance of the information"