| Title |
New approaches to cancer care in a COVID-19 world
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Oncology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30340-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Butler, Christian Finley, Charles H Norell, Samantha Harrison, Heather Bryant, Michael P Achiam, Alon D Altman, Nancy Baxter, James Bentley, Paul A Cohen, M Asif Chaudry, Elijah Dixon, Rhonda Farrell, Scott Fegan, Salila Hashmi, Claus Hogdall, John T Jenkins, Janice Kwon, Tom Mala, Orla McNally, Neil Merrett, Gregg Nelson, Andy Nordin, Jason Park, Geoff Porter, John Reynolds, Colin Schieman, Tine Schnack, Allan Spigelman, Lars Bo Svendsen, Peter Sykes, Robert Thomas |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 22% |
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 9% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 78% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Librarian | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,771,215
of 34,575,175 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Oncology
#2,724
of 8,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,468
of 462,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Oncology
#49
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,575,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.