↓ Skip to main content

Acute Ischemic Stroke Intervention

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Acute Ischemic Stroke Intervention
Published in
JACC, June 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.555
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is the leading cause of disability worldwide and among the leading causes of mortality. Although intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-rtPA) was approved nearly 2 decades ago for treatment of AIS, only a minority of patients receive it due to a narrow time window for administration and several contraindications to its use. Endovascular approaches to recanalization in AIS developed in the 1980s, and recently, 5 major randomized trials showed an overwhelming superior benefit of combining endovascular mechanical thrombectomy with IV-rtPA over IV-rtPA alone. In this paper, we discuss the evolution of catheter-based treatment from first-generation thrombectomy devices to the game-changing stent retrievers, results from recent trials, and the evolving stroke systems of care to provide timely access to acute stroke intervention to patients in the United States.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 226 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Student > Master 27 12%
Other 23 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Researcher 20 9%
Other 45 20%
Unknown 64 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Neuroscience 12 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 76 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,591,076
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#11,939
of 22,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,406
of 343,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#135
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.