↓ Skip to main content

Findings from a national improvement collaborative: are improvements sustained?

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Quality & Safety, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Findings from a national improvement collaborative: are improvements sustained?
Published in
BMJ Quality & Safety, April 2012
DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000243
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin M Glasgow, Michael L Davies, Peter J Kaboli

Abstract

Despite considerable efforts to improve healthcare quality and patient safety, broad measures of patient outcomes show little improvement. Many factors, including limited programme evaluations and understanding of whether quality improvement (QI) efforts are sustained, potentially contribute to the lack of widespread improvements in quality. This study examines whether hospitals participating in a Veterans Health Affairs QI collaborative have made and then sustained improvements.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 53 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Librarian 3 5%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 38%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 15 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2025.
All research outputs
#6,246,384
of 32,572,863 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#1,254
of 2,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,344
of 200,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#18
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,572,863 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.