↓ Skip to main content

The effect of BMP-mimetic peptide tethering bioinks on the differentiation of dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in 3D bioprinted dental constructs

Overview of attention for article published in Biofabrication, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
The effect of BMP-mimetic peptide tethering bioinks on the differentiation of dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in 3D bioprinted dental constructs
Published in
Biofabrication, July 2020
DOI 10.1088/1758-5090/ab9492
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ji Hoon Park, Gregory J Gillispie, Joshua S Copus, Weibo Zhang, Anthony Atala, James J Yoo, Pamela C Yelick, Sang Jin Lee

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 28 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Materials Science 6 9%
Engineering 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 31 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2020.
All research outputs
#14,288,653
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Biofabrication
#403
of 745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,866
of 432,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biofabrication
#12
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.