↓ Skip to main content

ACCF/ASE/ACEP/AHA/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2008 Appropriateness Criteria for Stress Echocardiography*

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
ACCF/ASE/ACEP/AHA/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2008 Appropriateness Criteria for Stress Echocardiography*
Published in
Circulation, March 2008
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.107.189097
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pamela S. Douglas, Bijoy Khandheria, Raymond F. Stainback, Neil J. Weissman, Eric D. Peterson, Robert C. Hendel, Raymond F. Stainback, Michael Blaivas, Roger D. Des Prez, Linda D. Gillam, Terry Golash, Loren F. Hiratzka, William G. Kussmaul, Arthur J. Labovitz, JoAnn Lindenfeld, Frederick A. Masoudi, Paul H. Mayo, David Porembka, John A. Spertus, L. Samuel Wann, Susan E. Wiegers, Ralph G. Brindis, Pamela S. Douglas, Robert C. Hendel, Manesh R. Patel, Eric D. Peterson, Michael J. Wolk, Joseph M. Allen

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 84 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Postgraduate 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Other 10 11%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 68%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2026.
All research outputs
#2,883,925
of 33,116,092 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#7,311
of 27,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,485
of 128,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#37
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,116,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.