↓ Skip to main content

Interinnominate motion and symmetry: comparison between gymnasts and nongymnasts.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, May 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Interinnominate motion and symmetry: comparison between gymnasts and nongymnasts.
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, May 1996
DOI 10.2519/jospt.1996.23.5.309
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Some clinical approaches to the treatment of low back pain evaluate and treat observed asymmetries of pelvic posture and motion. Scientific evidence suggests the motion available between the innominate bones is small and variable in nature. The purposes of this investigation were 1) to determine if interinnominate motion of subjects without low back pain was symmetrical in reciprocal test posture combinations, 2) to assess innominate bone symmetry in standing, and 3) to determine if a difference in the magnitude of interinnominate motion was present between a subject group which performs more frequent flexibility activities compared with a subject group representing the general population. Thirty-four subjects (eight male gymnasts, nine female gymnasts, eight male nongymnasts, and nine female nongymnasts) were evaluated in standing and three other reciprocal postures (modified standing, modified sitting, and half-kneeling). In each posture, the Metrecom Skeletal Analysis System was used to obtain coordinates for the anterior and posterior iliac spines. Projection angles were used to determine the relative positions of the right and left innominate bones. Results suggest that stand to right modified standing and stand to left modified standing oblique sagittal interinnominate composite motions were symmetrical, stand to right modified sitting and stand to left modified sitting oblique sagittal interinnominate composite motions were asymmetrical, and stand to right half-kneel and stand to left half-kneel oblique sagittal interinnominate composite motions' symmetrical properties were mixed depending on the group. Gymnasts as a group were found to have asymmetrically positioned innominate bones while nongymnasts as a group had symmetrically positioned innominate bones.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Slovenia 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 13 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 21 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2012.
All research outputs
#28,747,540
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#2,526
of 2,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,186
of 39,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.